Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 08:24

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Pain relief breakthrough as scientists discover a safer, non-addictive approach - Earth.com
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Circle IPO Is Said to Price Above Range to Raise $1.1 Billion - Bloomberg
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Some men love anal sex more than vaginal sex. Why?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Scientists Are Sending Cannabis Seeds to Space - WIRED
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
What’s next?
Are you worried that the 2024 US presidential election will result in a close race?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.